|
Roger Federer Makes Some Incredible Revelations in Rome at the
Italian Open!
Amazing what a 4 day preparation can do! This according to
Roger Federer is the ticket to Rome and possibly Roland Garros (I am amazed to
say the least!):
'I only arrived this morning (Sunday),' said the world No2. 'I have been
practicing as hard as I could here in Italy, up in the hills, tucked away.
I
won t tell you where as I like my privacy! Pierre (Paganini, fitness coach) was
there and I was basically getting used to clay court movements, the sliding.
I
mixed it up with some tennis, (Stefan) Koubek was there as a hitting partner,
and I made sure I did my four hours a day. At the end of the day, movement is a
big part.
The best clay-court players are the best movers. The only difference
is, here it is still fast even when it rains.
It only gets quick in Monte Carlo
or at Roland Garros when it is hot and the dust starts kicking up, and you can
see the hard court underneath.
Clay is better for my back though, and I have been
pain-free for a long time now which is great.'
My question is does Roger Federer really believe that his
sliding is what is getting him ready to play on clay? Are we talking here about
some delusion on Roger Federers part? Since when is sliding on a tennis court a
theme of discussion for a European player raised on the red stuff?!?
Also, if you are going to emphasize sliding in
training, are you not contradicting a fundamental part of modern tennis which is
quick recovery? If you are sliding around, you surely are not going to recover
as fast as needed!
Could this be a ploy from Federer to destabilize
threatening opponents that might get into the sliding mode and mess up
their own games? Anything is possible when someone is desperate!
Another startling statement from Federer was his dismissal
of an atrocious showing at Monte Carlo this year, where Wawrinka sent him
packing in straight sets in the Round of 16.
'I wasnt prepared for Monte Carlo due to the wedding (Federer married
his long-time girl friend Mirka Vavrinec the week before) so I
went there more to see what I was missing than expecting to do well.
What I was
missing was my serves and my forehands, so I have been working hard on that and
hopefully it will show this week.'
Unless there is an updated version of the 2009 ATP WORLD TOUR - RULEBOOK that
I do not know of, the CODE says:
'VIII. THE CODE
h) Best Efforts
i) A player shall use his best efforts during the match when competing in a
tournament.
Violation of this section shall subject a player to a fine up to $10,000 for
each violation.
2) Conduct Contrary to the Integrity of the Game
Conduct contrary to the integrity of the game shall
include, but not be limited to, comments to the news media that unreasonably
attack or disparage a tournament, sponsor, player, official or the ATP.'
The Monte Carlo Masters is one of the biggest prize money
tournaments of the ATP calendar 2009 doted with 2,750,000.00 EUR = 3,636,059.42 USD purse.
Does Roger Federer really understand the implications of what he is saying?
Furthermore, pulling out then arriving at a tournament two days before it begins, especially if there is a change of surface involved, is not a professional preparation for a competition of this level and for a player of Roger Federers status.
This begs the question why did Federer pull out of
the tournament in the first place?
It is not funny for the tournament organizers because it
would be an absolute blow to lose such a marquee player and second seeded in a
Masters series tournament! And out of the blue a hush-hush deal is made last
minute and a wild card is given to Federer! Wonder what made Federer change his mind?
Federer made another
revelation (I thought we all already knew) that Roland Garros, the one Grand Slam
he has not won, is still his
main goal.
'Whether I am number two in the world or three, five, eight or ten,
it is not number one.
Being the second best player in the world on clay is nice,
but it doesnt satisfy me. It is not necessary to be number one, what is
important is winning the French Open.'
Roger Federer better hope that Rafael Nadal falls into the 'sliding' suggestion, which I doubt,
because with this kind of preparation, I can only see another trashing in the
making for Roland Garros perhaps by someone other than Nadall!
Sergio Cruz
Support the TennisCruz website, use our search link partners and purchase from them. Anything you would like to find on this website or anywhere on the internet?
Find it here:
Tennis Related Articles and Tennis Instruction:
What makes Andy Murray so dangerous?
Tennis Instruction: Roger Federer - The Stop and Recovery
Tennis Instruction: Pete Sampras Backhand side Footwork
How to Master the Tennis Serve!
What is Pronation in the Tennis Service and Why Use it?
Tennis Instruction: The Basics of How to Hit a Volley
How to Hit Your Dream Tennis Backhand
Slice?
How to Hit a Great Low Tennis Backhand
Slice!
How to Master the Tennis High Backhand Topspin
How to hit an easy topspin tennis backhand?
The Topspin Backhand with a Forward Step
How to Master the Tennis Topspin Low
Backhand?
Related Video Tennis lessons:
Rafael Nadal - Tennis Service
Ana Ivanovic - Tennis Service
Federer - Sampras Tennis Service Compare
Maria Kirilenko - Low Forehand Volley
Roger Federer - Topspin backhand on the run
Rafael Nadal - Tennis Backhand Topspin
Tim Henman - Tennis Backhand Slice
Fernando Gonzales - Tennis Topspin Backhand
Roger Federer - Tennis Topspin Backhand II
Yannick Noah - Tennis Serve
Back From Roger
Federer Tennis Revelations - Amazing! to Tennis Cruz Main Page
Copyright © Tenniscruz.com®. All rights reserved.
|
Comment by TennisAce on 2009-05-12 07:59:45 Maybe Roger planned to play there all along, maybe not. But if he really decided to play at the last minute, the ONLY reason to do so would have been the payoff, because his game was nowhere near ready to make a strong showing.
| Comment by Barry Lewis on 2009-05-12 08:01:47 Roger's words would seem to indicate a new confidence, but I am not convinced. These are just words for the press, and their ultimate purpose is to raise a tiny bit of doubt in the minds of Nadal, Murray, Djokovic, Ferrer, Verdasco ... and the other top players who would likely beat Roger on red clay right now. With Nadal, silly word games will never work. He is too strong, too fit, too confident, too prepared. There is nothing Roger can do on clay to hurt Rafa except attack all the time, and he is unwilling (stubborn) and unable (fitness) to do that. | Comment by M. Jones on 2009-05-12 08:03:12 Nobody comes to Roland Garros and walks away with the trophy unless they have been playing great clay court tennis for a long time prior to the event. Roger has not. And so, Roger will not win the "Coupe de Mousquetaires". He may have grown up on red clay, and he may move quite well on the surface, but Roger never could have imagined that a bull like Nadal would come along. And Stefan Koubek may be a solid left-hander, but practicing with him vs. playing against Rafa is like comparing a Peugeot to a Ferrari F430.
| Comment by Sa on 2009-06-03 03:16:42 High performance athletes tennis players included, need sports medicine support. The challenge is to find the Doctors who provide them with what is legal, honest and that works! This is not a question of if, but rather what legal means do athletes use. The other side of the coin is, if they are legal they will need to work a lot harder physically for performances, that EPO, HGH, Nadrolone and other illegal means do for them without effort. So many chose the easy road. WADA is the way, in spite of its testing limitations, such as the lag on Gen-tech and a not so conclusive test on EPO.
|
Please login or register to add comments |