ATP-WTA-ITF-ETA modern tennis instruction, online video lessons.
Tennis Cruz
TENNIS VIDEO LESSONS
SPEED TRAINING
TENNIS ARTICLES
TENNIS BEST SHOTS
TENNIS SERVE
PRO TENNIS SERVE
SERVICE RETURNS
VOLLEYS
BACKHAND SLICE
FOREHAND
BACKHAND TOPSPIN
PASSING SHOTS
OVERHEAD SMASH
TENNIS QUESTIONS
FOOTWORK
TENNIS BLOG
TENNIS TIPS
TENNIS TIEBREAKER
COLLEGE TENNIS
COACHES CORNER
TENNIS GRIPS
GRAND SLAMS
TENNIS EXERCISES
ATP RANKING
ROD LAVER
TENNIS SCORING
CONSULTING SERVICES
Submit Tips/Articles
PLAYER - AGENTS
LINKS
CONTACT
SUBMIT A LINK
PRIVACY
WEB DIRECTORIES
SUPPORT SITE
DISCLAIMER
PARTNERS
USER AGREE
WRITE FOR US
TENNIS ASSOCIATIONS ADDRESSES
TENNIS JOBS
GOOGLE GIVES BACK
Login Form
Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
Syndicate

Tennis Cruz arrow Tennis Articles arrow Tennis Serve and Volley, Lies and....
Tennis Serve and Volley, Lies and.... PDF Print E-mail
Written by Sergio Cruz   
Aug 14, 2010 at 12:59 AM

...Altered States of Mind!

In Toronto Roger Federer had a hard time adjusting to the serve and volley and chip and charge game of Michael Llodra a French player who is mostly known as a doubles and tennis serve and volley specialist, but who has grown into a respected contender in the men's singles as well.

Even though Roger fell 1-4 behind in the first set, he pulled a 7-6(2), 6-3 win to go into the Toronto quarter finals against one of his nemesis Tomas Berdych.

Roger Federer said - 'It is fun playing that kind of a style once in a while, I kind of miss it, obviously. Having come through the rankings back in '98, '99, 2000, I was facing many of those kind of players, especially on the faster courts indoors.' After reading this comment at the press conference a large grin came to my face.

Starting in '98, how much fun could that have been for Roger Federer when his ATP ranking was in the 301 area and almost any ATP journey man beat him, especially serving and volleying?

With a ATP ranking in the three hundreds and lower as a player you do not exist, you are virtually nothing in the world of tennis, I just wonder how much fun that must have been for a proud Roger Federer who used to smash rackets during losses against such attackers and has a winners ego? My grin got bigger!

In '99 Roger's ranking went from 302 to 65, the only fun he could have had was that he saw his stock rising otherwise it was still a struggle. Serve and volley players like Tim Henman, that Roger claims he had 'fun' playing against, when in fact they were making his life hell and beating him in straight sets! For example 1999 Basel Open Tim Henman 6-3, 7-5.

Not to mention that being ATP Nr. 65 only entitles you to enter some of the toughest Indoor season qualifyings anyone would want to face, that is if you make it into the qualifying draw. If those hellish qualifying rounds and losing to serve and volley players, is the definition of 'fun' for Roger Federer, someone must be in an altered state of mind!

This further rebukes the statement of 'how much fun' it was playing serve and volley players in those years for Federer.

If you go back to the videotapes of those defeats from Federer against the serve and volley players he claims he had so much 'fun' playing against, what do you see?

- A despondent Roger Federer.

- A frustrated Roger.

- A Roger in tanking mode.(throwing the towel)

- A very upset Roger.

- A nervous and tight Federer.

A Roger Federer with a huge frown on his face, no smiles, no joy'!

Did anyone hear me say, 'fun'?

No, that was not fun nor would it be for anyone experiencing it, but it is a process of learning and developing every tennis player has to go through whether playing serve and volleyers or baseliners!

The real truth is Roger Federer never had any 'fun' playing serve and volley or attacking players.

Furthermore if Roger would have had to play more often against serve and volley players similar to Tim Henman or Pete Sampras his record would very likely have been reduced to less than half of what he has won in his career, Grand Slams included.

You can bet your booty that would not have been such 'fun' for Federer!

To re-enforce my point just look at the dismal record Federer has against Tim Henman and take into consideration that the last 4 or five victories Federer has on record against Henman, Tim was suffering from severe back injury and pain plus recovering from a series of other injuries.

No one can speculate but a healthy Henman would probably have won at least 3 of the last 5 encounters. As it is Roger leads Henman 7-6. I can not call such a record against an attacking serve and volley player, 'fun'!

Head to Head - Roger Federer 7 Tim Henman 6

Year Tournament & City Surface Round Winner & Score
2006 Tokyo
Japan
Hard F Federer, Roger
6-3, 6-3 Stats
2006 US Open
NY, U.S.A.
Hard R64 Federer, Roger
6-3, 6-4, 7-5 Stats
2006 Wimbledon
England
Grass R64 Federer, Roger
6-4, 6-0, 6-2 Stats
2005 ATP Masters Series Miami
FL, U.S.A.
Hard Q Federer, Roger
6-4, 6-2 Stats
2004 US Open
NY, U.S.A.
Hard S Federer, Roger
6-3, 6-4, 6-4 Stats
2004 ATP Masters Series Indian Wells
California, USA
Hard F Federer, Roger
6-3, 6-3 Stats
2004 Rotterdam
The Netherlands
Hard Q Henman, Tim
6-3, 7-6(9) Stats
2003 ATP Masters Series Paris
France
Carpet Q Henman, Tim
7-6(5), 6-1 Stats
2002 ATP Masters Series Miami
FL, U.S.A.
Hard R16 Federer, Roger
6-2 RET Stats
2001 Basel
Switzerland
Carpet F Henman, Tim
6-3, 6-4, 6-2 Stats
2001 Wimbledon
England
Grass Q Henman, Tim
7-5, 7-6(6), 2-6, 7-6(6) Stats
2000 Vienna
Austria
Hard S Henman, Tim
2-6, 7-6(4), 6-3 Stats
1999 Basel
Switzerland
Carpet Q Henman, Tim
6-3, 7-5 Stats

Below is part of the ranking progression of Roger Federer from 1998 at ATP Nr. 807 to 10.01.2000 at ATP Nr. 61 Federer was not yet a force to recon with in ATP standards.

In my view the 'Big change' in all facets of Federer's game was at the final in the Tennis Masters Cup Houston, TX, USA ATP World Tour 2003.

In the round robin, Roger defeated Andre Agassi 6-7(3), 6-3, 7-6(7) a normal score for two players that are close in quality and game. Four or five days later in the final of the same tournament, Roger completely trashed Agassi 6-3, 6-0, 6-4 (best of five sets), that is when the 'Big Change' revealed itself ...re-enforced by the unexpected immediate sacking of his very successful Coach Peter Lundgreen (not to confuse with Peter Carter who had died a few months past in South Africa).

Oh lá lá! The French would exclaim!

Then and only then, after the 'Big change' did Roger Federer start to have 'fun' and become a true force to reckon with in tennis. That 'Big Change' lasted for 4 years from October 2003 to October 2007 until he fell ill with 'Mononucleosis'.

In that four year period from a run of the mill good tennis player with talent, Federer became a demy-tennis-God and amassed an almost perfect (impossible) record by virtually winning almost every tournament he entered.

One of the reasons he became such a force in tennis was that serve and volley players and attackers, who previously defeated and challenged Federer stiffly, disappeared from the ATP Tour and that is when Federer started to have 'fun' and not in 1998 to 2000!

Coming to the end of this commentary, I conclude that the title is wrong! It should have been Tennis Serve and Volley Video Tapes and Lies!

The premisse of Roger Federer's statement; 'It is fun playing that kind of a style once in a while, I kind of miss it, obviously.', just does not make sense, I do not know any top tennis player that would have fun losing!

Roger Federer - Player Stats 1997-2000
Date Singles Doubles
18.12.2000 29 32
11.12.2000 29 32
04.12.2000 29 32
27.11.2000 29 32
20.11.2000 29 32
13.11.2000 24 30
06.11.2000 24 32
30.10.2000 25 33
23.10.2000 34 39
16.10.2000 32 39
09.10.2000 31 40
02.10.2000 30 39
18.09.2000 36 39
11.09.2000 36 38
28.08.2000 40 42
21.08.2000 40 42
14.08.2000 40 42
07.08.2000 39 45
31.07.2000 38 43
24.07.2000 40 43
17.07.2000 39 44
10.07.2000 39 46
26.06.2000 35 51
19.06.2000 35 50
12.06.2000 38 54
29.05.2000 54 55
22.05.2000 54 55
15.05.2000 50 67
08.05.2000 51 66
01.05.2000 48 65
24.04.2000 51 65
17.04.2000 49 93
10.04.2000 48 91
03.04.2000 50 94
20.03.2000 53 101
13.03.2000 50 159
06.03.2000 49 158
28.02.2000 58 153
21.02.2000 66 153
14.02.2000 54 149
07.02.2000 67 149
31.01.2000 61 150
17.01.2000 62 150
10.01.2000 61 151
13.12.1999 65 166
06.12.1999 65 166
29.11.1999 66 165
22.11.1999 66 167
15.11.1999 65 170
08.11.1999 58 151
01.11.1999 57 154
25.10.1999 66 160
18.10.1999 67 165
11.10.1999 93 164
04.10.1999 106 167
27.09.1999 96 169
20.09.1999 95 168
13.09.1999 104 181
30.08.1999 104 184
23.08.1999 106 181
16.08.1999 104 192
09.08.1999 103 195
02.08.1999 106 251
26.07.1999 106 248
19.07.1999 109 243
12.07.1999 109 245
05.07.1999 107 282
21.06.1999 103 507
14.06.1999 103 537
07.06.1999 104 543
24.05.1999 111 544
17.05.1999 114 543
10.05.1999 115 545
03.05.1999 123 536
26.04.1999 124 535
19.04.1999 128 537
12.04.1999 124 539
05.04.1999 124 544
29.03.1999 123 549
15.03.1999 125 546
08.03.1999 129 540
01.03.1999 129 616T
22.02.1999 129 617T
15.02.1999 178 621T
08.02.1999 176 621T
01.02.1999 243 619T
18.01.1999 298 620T
11.01.1999 299 620T
04.01.1999 302 623T
14.12.1998 301 620T
07.12.1998 616T
30.11.1998 302 622T
23.11.1998 305 622T
16.11.1998 303 623T
09.11.1998 395 968T
02.11.1998 393 968T
26.10.1998 398 984T
19.10.1998 397 974T
12.10.1998 395 987T
05.10.1998 396 979T
28.09.1998 878T 984T
21.09.1998 876T 985T
14.09.1998 672T 874T
31.08.1998 682T 895T
24.08.1998 680 895T
17.08.1998 679 890T
10.08.1998 679 887T
03.08.1998 679T 893T
27.07.1998 683 889T
20.07.1998 689 891T
13.07.1998 693 901T
06.07.1998 702 900T
22.06.1998 699 896T
15.06.1998 699 897T
08.06.1998 708 899T
25.05.1998 704 894T
18.05.1998 704 892T
11.05.1998 705 894T
04.05.1998 711 899T
27.04.1998 711 898T
20.04.1998 710T 898T
13.04.1998 712T 897T
06.04.1998 711T 895T
30.03.1998 710T 895T
16.03.1998 707T 895T
09.03.1998 708T 891T
02.03.1998 704T 893T
23.02.1998 705T 895T
16.02.1998 704T 895T
09.02.1998 703T 895T
02.02.1998 703T 890T
19.01.1998 706T 899T
12.01.1998 705T 896T
15.12.1997 704T 889T
08.12.1997 698T 881T
01.12.1997 699T 871T
24.11.1997 692T 871T
17.11.1997 700T 874T
10.11.1997 799T 1,129T
03.11.1997 802T 1,129T
27.10.1997 806T 1,136T
20.10.1997 803T 1,129T
13.10.1997 800T 1,131T
06.10.1997 799T 1,134T
22.09.1997 803T 1,137T


Sergio Cruz 

NewQuestions About Tennis Anyone? Feel free to ask, if I can not answer myself, I will research and find the solution to your question. Write directly to me at, cruze (@) bluewin.ch

 
Support the TennisCruz website, use our search link partners and purchase from them. Anything you would like to find on this website or anywhere on the internet? Be sure to find it, enter your search terms here:

Custom Search

Back from Tennis Serve and Volley, Lies and.... to Tennis Articles Main Section

Copyright © Tenniscruz.com®. All rights reserved.
User Comments

Please login or register to add comments

Popular
Latest News
Search